Research Article

Pragmatics of Impoliteness in Construction Sites: A Case study of Mwanza, Tanzania

Farida J. Washokera
St Augustine University of Tanzania, Tanzania
Lea Mpobela
St Augustine University of Tanzania, Tanzania
* Corresponding author
DOI icon 10.24018/ejlang.2023.2.2.79

Read Counter
515

Downloads
211

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2023-02-09
Published 2023-03-29

Read counter = 515 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

This article examined Pragmatics of Impoliteness in the construction sites: A case study of Mwanza region. The study based on Jonathan Culpeper’s impoliteness model (1996) and revised by Culpeper in 2005. Moreover, impoliteness strategies, reasons for using impoliteness, as well as responses for impoliteness in construction sites have been researched. The study is of the view that impoliteness strategies are applied in the construction sites so as to achieve certain goals. This is a qualitative study with the data gathered through observation, interview and focus group discussion. The data have been collected from the seven construction sites. The study concluded that all the five impoliteness strategies (Bald on record, positive, negative, mock or sarcasm impoliteness and withhold politeness) listed by Culpeper were used by the construction workers and there were reasons for using impoliteness strategies some of them were; to raise working morale, to entertain the workers and to provide simple and clear information and instruction.

Keywords: construction sites construction site workers impoliteness impoliteness strategies

References

  1. Afzaal, M., Baoqin, W., Noor, U. & Younas, M. (2020). Impoliteness strategies and rapport-challenge pragmatic orientation in competing utterance. Revista Argentina.
     Google Scholar
  2. Austine, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bousfield, D. & Locher, M. (2008). Impoliteness in language: studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Mouton De Gruyter.
     Google Scholar
  4. Bousfield, D. (2007). Beginnings, middles and ends: A Biopsy of the Dynamics of Impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, 39 (12), 2185–2216. Doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.005.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bousfield, D. (2008). Impoliteness in interaction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
     Google Scholar
  6. Bousfield, D., Culpeper, J. & Wichman, A. (2003). Impoliteness Revisited: with Special Reference to dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35 (10), 1545–1579. Doi: 10.1016/s0378-2166(02)00118-2.
     Google Scholar
  7. Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  8. Chaika, E. (1994). Language: the social mirror. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. Sage.
     Google Scholar
  10. Critchmar, J. (2005). President George Bush Junior’s Visit to the European Union. 21st February 2005. ITV news.
     Google Scholar
  11. Culpeper, J. (1995). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Lancaster University.
     Google Scholar
  12. Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25 (3), 349-367. Doi: 10.1016/0378-2166(95)00013-3.
     Google Scholar
  13. Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: the weakest Link. Journal of Politeness Research Language Behaviour Culture, 1 (1), 35-72. Doi:10. 1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35.
     Google Scholar
  14. Culpeper, J. (2009). Impoliteness: using and understanding the language of offence. Lancaster University
     Google Scholar
  15. Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  16. Culpeper, J. (2017) Impoliteness. Lancaster University.
     Google Scholar
  17. Gabriel, Y. (1998). An introduction to the social psychology of insults in organizations. SAGE Journals, 51 (11), 1329-1354
     Google Scholar
  18. Grice, P. H. (1975). Logic and conversation. Academic Press.
     Google Scholar
  19. Gunawan, S. (2017). Sherlock Holmes’ Impoliteness Strategies and other Characters’ Responses in Sherlock TV Series Season 1Episode 1. Sanata Dharma University.
     Google Scholar
  20. Kienpointer, M. (2008). Impoliteness and Emotional Arguments. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2008.012.
     Google Scholar
  21. Kryk-Kastovsky, B. (2006). Impoliteness in early modern English courtroom discourse. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 7(2), 213-243. Doi: 10. 1075/hjp.7.2.04kry.
     Google Scholar
  22. Lakoff, R. T. (2006). Civility and its discontents: or getting in your face. John Benjamins.
     Google Scholar
  23. Lakoff, R.T. (1973). Language and woman’s place. University of California.
     Google Scholar
  24. Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
     Google Scholar
  25. Locher, A. M., & Watts, J. R. (2008). Relational work and impoliteness: negotiating norms of linguistic behaviours. Mouton de Gruyter.
     Google Scholar
  26. Locher, A. M. (2006). Polite behaviours within relational work: the discursive approach to politeness: multilingual. Multilingual: Journal of Cross Cultural and interlanguage Communication, 25 (3), 249–267. Doi: 10.1515/MULTI.2006.015.
     Google Scholar
  27. Lucky, B. J. (2015). A pragmatic analysis of impoliteness strategies in British TV-Series Sherlock. Yogyakarta State University.
     Google Scholar
  28. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don’t understand women and men in conversation. Morrow & Co Inc.
     Google Scholar
  29. Thielemann, N. & Kosta, P. (2013). Approaches to Slavic interaction. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar