Signing a Pact with the Devil: Hermeticism in Shakespeare’s Macbeth



Abstract Views
351

Downloads
132

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Aug 23, 2022
Published Sep 21, 2022
10.24018/ejlang.2022.1.5.32

Abstract viewed = 351 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The Renaissance was an enlightening period in which new ethics and world views emerged. A move from a zealous Christian creed to an interest in worldly pleasures and the cult of the self and beauty were preached.

Running parallel to these big discoveries and giant progress in different spheres, Renaissance England still bore the vestige of credence in what is considered as “weird” to contemporary man as ghosts, apparitions, and witches. Magic continued to be evoked and practices of witchcraft bore its fruition back then. What is noticeable is that despite the overall ambiance of a prevailing rational mood and thirst for the palpable, Hermeticism had a strongly felt presence in the new social milieu.

This paper seeks to turn an analytical eye on hermeticism that was vividly present during Shakespeare’s time through his tragedy, Macbeth. Above all, it sheds light on the evil practices that were conquering the Elizabethans despite the progressive era that the nation was witnessing.

Keywords: Hermeticism, Macbeth, magic, mystic

References

  1. Caciola, N. (2000). Mystics, Demoniacs, and the Physiology of Spirit Possession in Medieval Europe. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 42-268.
     Google Scholar
  2. Copenhaver,B.P. (1992). Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  3. Debus, Allen G., Merkel. (1998). Hermeticism and Renaissance: Intellectual History and Occult in Early Modern Europe. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Press.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ebon, M. (1972). They Knew the Unknown. New York: World Publishing Co, 1972.
     Google Scholar
  5. Elton, WR. (1986). Shakespeare and the Thought of His Age. In Stanley Wells (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 17-24.
     Google Scholar
  6. Fowden, G. (1986). The Egyptian Hermes: A Historical Approach to the Late Pagan Mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  7. Georgi, D., Strugnell, J. (1971). Concordance to the Corpus Hermeticum. Cambridge, MA: Boston Theological Institute.
     Google Scholar
  8. Grace M Jantzen, (1994). Feminists, Philosophers, and Mystics. Hypatia 9, no. 4.186-195.
     Google Scholar
  9. Henderson L., J. Cowan, E.J. (2011). Scottish Fairy Belief: A History. Edinburgh: John Donald, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  10. McNamara, J. (1992-93). Ovidius Naso was the Man: Shakespeare’s Debt to Ovid. Fox Classics Lecture.
     Google Scholar
  11. Pike, N. (1992). Mystic Union: An Essay in the Phenomenology of Mysticism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
     Google Scholar
  12. Raghukul Tilak, Shakespeare: Macbeth (New Delhi: Rajhans Prakashan Mandir, 1997), P. 20.
     Google Scholar
  13. Ronald, H. (2014). The Making of the Early Modern British Fairy Tradition. The Historical Journal 57.4. 1148-1157.
     Google Scholar
  14. Smith, E. (2004). Shakespeare’s Tragedies. UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  15. Smith, E. (2007). The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  16. Stace, W. (1961). Mysticism and Philosophy. London: Macmillan, 1961.
     Google Scholar
  17. Sterner, J. (1970). The Renaissance Age. New York: World Publishing Co, 1970.
     Google Scholar
  18. Stewart, C. (1997). Thinking with Demons: The Idea of Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
     Google Scholar
  19. Walker, B. (1992). The Renaissance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  20. William, J. (1958). The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Mentor Books, 1958.
     Google Scholar